Microsoft, Middle Management and Why Some Companies Can't Innovate

This week's op-ed piece (Microsoft's Creative Destruction) in the New York Times from Dick Brass, a former Microsoft VP, was a wake up call for the tech world. In a thoughtful but ultimately scathing piece, Brass describes how and why Microsoft gradually evolved from an innovative company with first-mover advantage to a technological also-ran scrambling behind just about everyone in bringing new products to market:

"As they marvel at Apple’s new iPad tablet computer, the technorati seem to be focusing on where this leaves Amazon’s popular e-book business. But the much more important question is why Microsoft, America’s most famous and prosperous technology company, no longer brings us the future, whether it’s tablet computers like the iPad, e-books like Amazon’s Kindle, smartphones like the BlackBerry and iPhone, search engines like Google, digital music systems like iPod and iTunes or popular Web services like Facebook and Twitter. [...]

Microsoft has become a clumsy, uncompetitive innovator. Its products are lampooned, often unfairly but sometimes with good reason. Its image has never recovered from the antitrust prosecution of the 1990s. Its marketing has been inept for years; remember the 2008 ad in which Bill Gates was somehow persuaded to literally wiggle his behind at the camera?

While Apple continues to gain market share in many products, Microsoft has lost share in Web browsers, high-end laptops and smartphones. Despite billions in investment, its Xbox line is still at best an equal contender in the game console business. It first ignored and then stumbled in personal music players until that business was locked up by Apple.

Microsoft’s huge profits — $6.7 billion for the past quarter — come almost entirely from Windows and Office programs first developed decades ago. Like G.M. with its trucks and S.U.V.’s, Microsoft can’t count on these venerable products to sustain it forever. Perhaps worst of all, Microsoft is no longer considered the cool or cutting-edge place to work. There has been a steady exit of its best and brightest."

Obviously, something happened to the culture of the company, changing the very direction of what it means to work at Microsoft. One way to conceptualize this is to think about the "impenetrable layer of suck" that tends to grow at just about every company -- especially those already bloated with layer upon layer of middle management. On her Strange Attractor blog, Suw Charman-Anderson has posted a fantastic graphic showing how this "impenetrable layer of suck" works. Creative ideas never quite make their way down through an organization. Note the squiggly red lines that are the "social media fissures" -- these are just about the only way that innovative ideas work can find their way down to the rank-and-file members of an organization.

You can read the New York Times op-ed piece as a bit of grumbling and mumbling from a disaffected former employee -- or as a warning shot fired across the bow to other tech companies like Yahoo, Google and Amazon -- all of which are no longer young, frisky, risk-seeking startups. Apple may no longer be a young start-up, either, but it has thus far avoided the "impenetrable layer of suck." Steve Jobs has almost single-handedly enabled innovative ideas to come to market through charisma and sheer force of will. Which explains to a large degree why Microsoft was never able to realize the full potential of the Tablet PC, while Apple was able to generate a market sensation around the iPad.

[image: The Impenetrable Layer of Suck via Strange Attractor]

Comments

[buy viagra]

software is one of the greatest needs in today's market, I have always considered that every entrepreneur should have a basic knowledges in this field, as many companies depend on these systems to make important decisions.

[Online Viagra]

I don't know how much of an accomplishment that is. The one comment I'll follow-up on is process and getting code done effectively and the feature crews that Office is bragging about.

[Kamagra]

Drop him a note, start a conversation... let me know how it goes. Oh, and before moving on, I noticed that Mr. Sinofsky said he might address performance evaluations in a future posting: yes, please. I'd love to hear Steve's take on Stack Ranking and The Curve and why that's as good as it gets.

[truck rental]

You pointed out a metaphor about windows is like G.M. with its trucks and S.U.V.’s, but think it in another direction - what about Microsoft can be like Toyota and their life-threatening cars' problems? would it harm Microsoft even a little in the place of a big monopoly?

[Clenbuterol]

Anyway Bill Gates keeps to remain one of the richest people of the world

[Air Jordans]

That is too cool! thanks.*

[Ear Thermometer]

It's really a very good article,I learn so much thing from it,thanks.You are really a nice person.

[Nike Air Max 90]

I agree with your point,nice article,thanks.I will continue to read your articles.

[wholesale phone]

The website from the makers of this beast makes it all worthwhile, I was in tears laughing at some of the photos and information!
It states 'spaceship technology' as one of the options. I know I'd have me some of that 'spaceship technology' when ticking the options box, never know when it could come in handy! Brilliant stuff, crazy, but brilliant
20110129pilipalagaga

[estate auctions arizona]

That seems to be never ending.

[ベネトリン]

Hey, Great post