Over the past 30 days or so, there has been a sudden explosion of interest surrounding 3D entertainment technology -- driven in no small part by the phenomenal success of James Cameron's Avatar. (Apparently, more than 70% of Avatar ticket sales are from 3D or IMAX screenings.) This week in Las Vegas, there has been buzz around 3D television technology from mainstream consumer electronics companies such as Panasonic - which recently revealed itself to be a "pal" of Avatar when it comes to bringing 3D entertainment technology to the masses. On top of that, ESPN recently announced plans to launch a new sports channel for live 3D events.
On the surface, it would appear that "3D TV" is poised to become the first breakout innovation hit of 2010. Dig a little deeper, though, and it's not clear how innovative 3D technology really is. It could turn out to be a "Red Sox" technology - a technology destined to tantalize its fans for decades at a time without achieving its true potential. Take speech recognition software, for example -- sounds great in theory, but frustrating in practice. Or how about e-books or virtual conferencing or any number of other technologies that always seems to be right at the cusp of greatness?
Writing about the potential of ESPN 3D, Justin Peters of Slate.com makes a simple but elegant argument about 3D entertainment technology that's worth keeping in mind. The reason why the 3D effects in Avatar are so impressive (and trust me, it's worth shelling out the extra 5 bucks or so for the full 3D treatment - I was blown away by Avatar) is because nobody has any idea of what a blue Na'vi should look like, let alone in 3D:
"Live-action 3-D differs from the 3-D camerawork made famous in CGI-heavy movies like Avatar. A 3-D representation of the computer-generated Na'vi looks great largely because you've never seen a Na'vi before. Since you have no idea what a blue cat person is supposed to look like (and since the blue cat people are computer-generated), you don't pick up on any visual distortions. But we all know how a real, 3-D human is supposed to look—and, while watching a 3-D football game, you're acutely aware that the guys in helmets and pads don't look exactly right. The difference between JaMarcus Russell and 3-D JaMarcus Russell is like the difference between Elvis and the world's best Elvis impersonator."
In other words, once you know what a 3D effect is supposed to look like, it's immediately less impressive than it should be. Which reminds me of my recent experience buying a new HDTV big enough to blow away any guests I might invite over to enjoy a baseball game in HD... I tuned the TV to the "regular" channel and asked my guests to watch a Yankees game for a few minutes. And then I tuned the TV to the HD channel, where I was highly confident that I would witness a true epiphany. I literally expected my guests to break down in tears at the experience of watching A-Rod and Jeter and Mariano in crisp, detailed HD. But what did I get? "Nice TV. Looks great... but I can't tell the difference between the regular and HD channels."
Which is what, I fear, will be the case with 3D TV. There's clearly something going on with video gaming technology and CGI and augmented reality, but I'm not sure if the final answer is 3D TV.
[image: Blue Na'vi from Avatar]
I wish I'd read this post in January rather than today - it would have saved me rushing to experience real people being depicted in 3D. I can only agree with the main thrust of the article. I recently watched a soccer (UK football) game in 3D and you're correct - it was not quite right. Humans are very good at recognising other humans but have no experience recognising the shapes, surfaces, textures and colours associated with animations they've never seen before. Great technology but there's still some way to go.
Posted by: John (Recording Studio) Murray | April 08, 2010 at 06:45 AM
the world of entertainment so much since the appearance of the mass media in early 10's
Posted by: cheap soft cialis | April 08, 2010 at 11:32 AM
who is the singer for the new de beers commercial. a women is asleep
on the bed and her lover wakes her by placing a diamond necklace on
top of her. how can i obtain this?
Posted by: orexis online | April 16, 2010 at 06:56 PM
this film or that they say has excellent effects, but I feel it is poor plot, I think that is not centralized to a large segment of the population since the genre faltancia / fiction not please everyone, but I congratulate you for that excellent production.
Posted by: kamagra online | April 21, 2010 at 04:30 PM
Contact lenses are small discs that rest on the fluid which covers the
cornea. Contact lenses are more comfortable than ever thanks to
refinements in the materials used to make them.
Posted by: viagra online | April 26, 2010 at 08:18 PM
Your article is written very content, All of the projects look great! you make it look so simple to make this purse that I'll have to try it myself! Thanks!
Posted by: Jordan 17 | May 13, 2010 at 04:08 AM
I have to agree with you.The gaming industry will be the biggest market for 3D.But never underestimate progress....There are always issues with new technology so I am still optimistic..
http://www.3dtv-information.com
Posted by: Genos2007 | June 26, 2010 at 09:00 AM
3D movies are really great. The color definition. And it's like a real one. I love this invention!
Posted by: contact lenses | June 30, 2010 at 03:59 AM
Totally. That's why I consider 3D TVs to be the future of television technology.
Posted by: 3D TV | August 10, 2010 at 10:15 AM
Hello,
Yes, I saw Avatar, and I saw all the 3D. What I particularly liked was the way the forest appeared to recede far into the distance and the way the seeds of the Tree of Life floated forward in the space between me and the movie screen. Those seeds reminded me of the lovely comb jellies or "sea walnuts" that inhabit the waters around Woods Hole, MA in late summer. Sea walnuts are bioluminescent so at night while swimming you can see them floating at different distances in the dark waters around you.
Thanks very much for sharing this great post. keep posting.
Posted by: kamagra online | August 23, 2010 at 04:36 AM
In early 80ies I watched a 3D film
Posted by: Buy Steroids | September 14, 2010 at 09:25 AM
i think that the media need to mind their own business and not pry into the sex lives and private lives of famous people. I am sure if they became famous they would not want that plasters everywhere for the world to see their private lives.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | September 17, 2010 at 11:18 PM
Two thumbs up for 3D movies,,it's very realistic..you can feel the rush!
Posted by: Paul from Silver Coast Finest | October 07, 2010 at 09:50 PM
I agree, 3d enterntainment is not new. However, these 3d tvs could be the first to break through into the mainstream.
Posted by: 3D TV | December 27, 2010 at 05:49 PM
JST-Technologies, a multi-faceted and well established MNC with its works in Mohali, Punjab welcomes sincere talents studying in universities and colleges in India for their 6 months Industrial Training program.
Posted by: JST Technologies | January 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM
Now that Tommy has extracted as much money as he can from Hollywood liberals and Wall Street, he'll try to 'run to the right' - but he shouldn't delude himself into thinking that his track record won't follow him.
Posted by: Juicy Couture On Sale | January 22, 2011 at 03:26 AM
Tässä on mökkikoneeni. Olen ompelemassa kahvipusseista kassia. pusseja en ole saanut kerättyä kovin paljoa, joten kassista tuli aika kirjava. Suikaleiden ompelussa kului yllättävän paljon aikaa by joy.
Posted by: Cheap Chanel Bags | February 16, 2011 at 08:42 PM